Dear brother, … why by heaven’s sake are you allowing yourself to stir down Bonita’s comment? Wouldn’t be more + uplifting as your eldest brother/Father show you, point out to enhance, praise your sister comment. May I need to remind you how « delicate » may be your relation specially when encounter on same thread? Why sadden her soul !!!
MidiChlorian regarding her post … Bonita expressed a sane, logic, not attempting or give a whirl out of proper context.
MidiChlorian excepting your pretending first line in your post … what you said was right and adequate.
André – I’m not sure where you are coming from or going to with your post but, my post regarding a portion Bonita’s previous posting was in the lines of additional questions, as were indicated by using “?” (question marks). Where I understand the premise that she had presented and I agree that the words read in TUB, are meaningless without the help of the entities she mentioned, whereby a reader, as an individual, would also be affected by their experiences or even learning from other text, which would indicate that these entities, being personal in nature to an individual or individuals, would reflect different results on that individual, regarding how or what they may believe and thereby also affecting their faith. Bonita has presented valid and logical information as she understands it to be, and I do not question her on these aspects of her presentation but, only wish to hear from her, as she might think other readers could comprehend those things which she presents, what “TUB does is redirect minds and souls”, “directionless due to the lack of material teachers of truth.” And for some, not all, this may be true, however, her statement that followed “Spiritual insight is the only way to glean the truth from its words,” which I also agree with in part, but would also depend on the individual, in that every individual situation is different and would not necessarily yield the same results.
Bonita has a enqueue way of looking at things and she is able to connect with others, however my query to her would be, how would her general presentation apply, more specifically, to certain individuals based on how they may respond to what is written in TUB or even more so, on this forum? She indicated that she thinks that she “rambles on”, where I do not see this to be the case, but rather mixing to much material together, where TUB groups material into subjects and topics, and others might benefit more if she individualized some of her material. I for one read her responses, and sometimes have difficulty in connecting all of it together, and would like more specific answers which I know that she will not respond to me because she has said that she and I are at odds, her words not mine.
