I cannot think of any harm that may have come from giving them the awareness in advance that the child they are carrying is of unprecedented import.
What about the tremendous discord between mother and son as to his Mission on Earth. Messiah of the Jewish variety or spiritual teacher?
Me, here. Clearly, Michael is too busy to write his autobiography.
Michael is in charge of time. No excuse if he really wanted to write it. As it is, he did not even allow his name in TUB as a sponsor of any paper.
Keep in mind, also, that Elizabeth and Mary were far from the only people to be given advance notice.
But not by Gabriel personally. Who authorized Gabriel to give notice to Mary? Who authorized the unnamed seraphim?
I’m inclined to believe that Gabriel’s visitations were an integral part of the bestowal plan.
We are told of the bestowal plan and this detail was left out. Why? Was it authorized by Immanuel or did Gabriel do this one this own? Or did Michael tell Gabriel to disclose this to Mary? I can hear the Master say, “tell no one”.
They were all the more astonished when John now made known to them the story of the Gabriel visitation to Mary before Jesus was born, and also that Jesus spoke no word to him even after he had told him about this.
(135:9.1)
Jesus did not acknowledge to John the issue of Gabriel’s visitation to Mary. Hmmm.
“One evening about sundown, before Joseph had returned home, Gabriel appeared to Mary by the side of a low stone table and, after she had recovered her composure, said: “I come at the bidding of one who is my Master and whom you shall love and nurture. To you, Mary, I bring glad tidings…” (122:3.1)
The reason Gabriel announced to Mary that she was carrying the child of destiny was because Gabriel was told to do so. Anybody who wants to question the wisdom of that further, they’ll have to take it up with the Creator Son.
I already have.
We assume that Gabriel’s Master is none other than Michael, but at this time Michael was already incarnated. Was Gabriel told to do such a thing before the bestowal of Michael or by Immanuel?
It sounds by your inquiry that you doubt who’s in charge and then who’s in charge of them. You think Michael is missing? Or indifferent? Or lacks control or authority? Weird. That’s all a little above my pay grade to speculate or make claims or doubt or fear.</blockquote
It sounds by your inquiry to my inquiry that you really don’t care. So it is better to shut up in such cases. Pay grade?
I thought you were a volunteer to fear and doubt.
Many of our questions are addressed in the book! This is a marvelous feature of the book!
But I have so many more questions. And I am getting them answered. Ask and you shall receive.