Bonita, it is implied in the very revelation you and Bradly quote:
Isn’t implication another form of personal interpretation? Implication means that there is a suggestion of something, an innuendo or imputation. In fact the words leave no implication that the descending Sons must broadcast their emotions and acts to the Creator Son. In fact, it says that the Creator Son is personally conscious of every act and every emotion of every descending Son without any qualifiers at all. Your statement that the Creator Son can only be conscious of these things if the descending Sons ” . . . operate in full disclosure and publicize their feelings. When those conditions are met, reflectivity occurs and contact is made.” (your words)
Bonita, in order to reflect, there has to be a receiving end. If you are on the receiving end, you are dependent then on the party reflecting to you. It is a two-way relationship as I told you before. I encourage you to consider the definition of the word reflection:
1.
to cast back (light, heat, sound, etc.) from a surface:
The mirror reflected the light onto the wall.
2.
to give back or show an image of; mirror.
3.
(of an act or its result) to serve to cast or bring (credit, discredit,etc.) on its performer.
4.
to reproduce; show:
followers reflecting the views of the leader.
5.
to throw or cast back; cause to return or rebound:
Her bitterness reflects gloom on all her family.
20:1.13 . . . he is personally conscious of every act and emotion of every descending Son of God serving in his domain.
There are no qualifiers at all in the above quote.
You are incorrect. The qualifier is “serving in his domain.” Lucifer et al. do not serve in Michael’s domain. FACT.
What do you think is Michael’s domain? Did Lucifer ever serve outside of Michael’s domain?
Michael’s domain is the local universe, Nebadon. Lucifer NO LONGER serves in this domain. He stopped serving when he REBELLED. He is now interned. Therefore that revelation NO LONGER applies to him.
How are you defining the word “serve”? Does service only mean preforming a duty?
That is exactly what it means unless you can prove otherwise.
The revelators are not Michael, are they?
No. The Revelators are not Michael.
Here is another revelation where the Revelator admits mind is not fully known which forces them to qualify certain of their revelations on mind: 9:6.8 The mind-gravity circuit is dependable; it emanates from the Third Person of Deity on Paradise, but not all the observable function of mind is predictable. Throughout all known creation there parallels this circuit of mind some little-understood presence whose function is not predictable. We believe that this unpredictability is partly attributable to the function of the Universal Absolute. What this function is, we do not know; what actuates it, we can only conjecture; concerning its relation to creatures, we can only speculate.
As I said above, the revelators are not Michael, nor are the Paradise Sons. Did any Michael, Daynal or Avonal write any part of TUB? I can’t recall. Quotes 9:6.8-9 have nothing to do with spiritual gravity of the Eternal Son, of which the Michaels and other Paradise Sons use a local universe duplicate:
You are not making sense. The revelation above illustrates mind cannot be fully known as you and Bradly implied when you referenced a revelation that did not even bolster your position.
20:1.13 Here is a divine reflection, a local universe duplication, of that absolute spiritual drawing power of the Eternal Son which enables him to reach out to make and maintain contact with all his Paradise Sons, no matter where they may be in all the universe of universes.
And how does reflectivity apply to faith based Sons of God? Paradise Sons are not faith based. They know the Father. Descending Sons of God believe and have Faith in the Father. They do not possess the capacity to “know” him like the Paradise Sons. Further, reflectivity, as I explained before, is a TWO-WAY relationship, not a ONE-WAY as you think.
