These two concepts do create a paradox, which is difficult to comprehend, so I take your point. However, the original question was if both concepts are essential to religion, not whether or not logic and reason can comprehend how both can be true. Clearly, in the religion of Jesus it is faith-insight which discerns that the personality of the Father is transcendently present in the universe on Paradise and his spirit is immanently present within us, even though the intellect cannot really comprehend how this is so.
Yes, I think both concepts are part of religion but I’m not sure the essential qualities of either concept matter much because religion evolves. Religion is a natural phenomenon. Religion will happen and it will evolve regardless of concepts. The concept of a transcendental God was already part of most religions at the time Jesus taught. It was the concept of fatherhood and the concept of God being within each individual that was so revelational. I think religion begins its evolution with fear of the unknown and that fear becomes a Great Fear, one that can be bargained with, awed, reverenced and finally trusted. The evolution of religion is to make this Great Fear personable and friendly. Isn’t that what Jesus taught, the Creator-creature connection? how the creature reaches up because the Creator is reaching down? Didn’t he teach sonship which connects the transcendent with the immanent and unifies it all in the Supreme?
(1262.1) 115:3.4 It is only man’s distance from infinity that causes this concept to be expressed as one word. While infinity is on the one hand UNITY, on the other it is DIVERSITY without end or limit. Infinity, as it is observed by finite intelligences, is the maximum paradox of creature philosophy and finite metaphysics. Though man’s spiritual nature reaches up in the worship experience to the Father who is infinite, man’s intellectual comprehension capacity is exhausted by the maximum conception of the Supreme Being. Beyond the Supreme, concepts are increasingly names; less and less are they true designations of reality; more and more do they become the creature’s projection of finite understanding toward the superfinite.
Not to belabor the function of the soul here, but isn’t the soul our personal maximum conception of the Supreme? And, isn’t that where Jesus lives, the fella who reveals the potential of the Supreme to us, the fella who already attained the level of Supremacy? Isn’t his Spirit of Truth really the Spirit of the Father and the Son? Personally, I’m not all that concerned about the transcendence of God, I take that for granted. What I don’t take for granted is the evolution of my own soul which involves the immanence of God. My surviving identity is totally dependent upon the growth of my soul, and that growth also depends on God partnering with me, his lowly critter.


