When the revealators tell us that Paradise is the nucleus of the Ultimaton are they implying that these entities are separate? I dont think so, not within the framework of the standard model anyway.
Hi nelsong,
You are right to question these things. We are not given unearned knowledge straight away from TUB. The standard model is very flawed and atomic theory in particular.
I have come up with an atomic model that is more consistent with TUB. Of course its starts with the ultimaton. I has Paradise as its nucleus. Absolute gravity controls its motion. As one hundred ultimatons condense into an electronic unit, they are all spinning and huddling. This means that they breath in and out very rapidly in concert with their revolutionary velocities. This is completely analogous to the primary and secondary motions of space. Now we have linear gravity and these units interact with other particles. The electronic units are protons, electrons and neutrons, and mesotons. They are all one and the same particle.
As the particle breath in and expands, it is negatively charging and radiating. When it is contracting, it is positively charging and absorbing energy. At full contracting, the particle becomes a perfect sphere and is neutral without charge. The mesotron acts as an intermediary between proton and neutron to stabilize the atom and the time that mesotrons are present determines the ‘number” of neutrons ascribed to the atom. These mesotron then become radiating particles, or electrons.
Imagine the these ultimatons exist in spinning shells of energy condensation and can be imbedded like layers in an onion. One hundred constitutes an atom of hydrogen, 9,200 constitutes a uranium atom.
The matter of the inverse square law deserves explanation. Newton’s law of gravitation includes the inverse square law because of observed data at that time about the Earth-moon interactions. TUB clearly sates that this is only a rough approximation of the diminution of gravitation effect do to space forces that act to annul gravity. It has little to do with the gravitational field per se. TUB tells us that gravity acts preferentially in the plane perpendicular to mass.
Therefore, mass cannot be a point mass as Newton and Einstein figured. It cannot be a spherical field. It must be a field generated by inertial masses at the poles of revolving planet or Sun. Thus mass has two foci, one at each pole and that field is that of the circles of Apollonius. Only in this way can can gravity act perpendicular to mass. Mass is the line drawn between the poles of the sphere and not the center of the sphere. A center point can have nothing perpendicular to it, only radii.
When energy at the levels of a supercollider generate temperatures nearing the 35 million degrees of the Sun’s core, there is potential for electron melting. This disruption can give all sort of strange particles never seen in nature because they are not stable. For whatever reason, 100 ultimatons constitutes a stable electron. Any more or less is possibly unstable.
The shells of energy packets or quanta must be ordered to coincide with the prime number distribution and this is governed by the base of the natural logarithm. I’ll refer you to a book by Petre Plitchta, a German author of the book, “God is Back”
When it comes to gravity and mass, remember that gravity controls mass not the other way around. And Paradise as the source of absolute gravity is a controller. Paradise controls the mass of every atom in the Universe of Universes. When TUB tell us that gravity acts perpendicular to mass, control always act in a perpendicular fashion. When you spin a tethered ball around your head, you control the ball by you rope tension that act perpendicular to the circular path of the ball. This is analogous to Absolute gravity. Linear gravity has a field because it relies on the masses or absolute pull at two locations, the poles. This one is difficult to explain so I’ll ask for questions at this point.
Manny
