Finally, it might be better to quote my words rather than put words in my mouth: “….this non-soul, as you would put it….” – actually I’ve never used that term in my life so I wouldn’t put it that way at all. I appreciate your efforts to understand me but no reason to misquote or misrepresent my words which does not reflect well on any discussion or debate or research on this or any topic.
Bradly, are you so naïve to think that your remark above was not meant as an insult, where if I were to have quoted you I would have put quotes around “non-soul” but is it not you who insisted that I present text, which could question your emphatic interpretations within the UB, where I could have taken those phrases which you underlined within UB quotes which if examined and applied to context and grammar would show the same persistence to show me the error of my ways, or the correctness of your ways or abilities. But, the use of non-soul, was used in the context whereby to support your belief that a soul cannot exist prior to its “birth” as literally indicated in the UB. Therefore, to someone who is emphatic that prior to this event, there is no possibility of a soul, what would I assume that you would call it, the maybe-soul.
It took about a week cataloging all appearances and variations associated with the word “soul” in the UB, and I came up with many interesting associations, but not all can be associated as static variations of its use. Also, I have found that the UB contradicts itself in many ways by the use of a similar phrase used for the same intention, where this contradiction seemed to be deliberate in order to tie specific subjects together for the purpose of explaining specific subjects which would or had not been explained in detail. As I said before I am very good at recognizing patterns, and I’m not blowing my own horn, I was tested, using tests which were designed to not be complete-able, and having finished with 20 minutes to spare with an accuracy rating of over 99.5% which even surprised me. I see things that others would not see. So, my persistence is not to get you to change your mind but only to get you understand why I think the way I do, regardless of your opinion of me which is only an opinion because you have no idea of who I am, but I regret having to salt my word in response to yours but, I’ve seen you do this with others, although not that much recently until now. My interest on this forum is complimentary to my study of personalities, and being able to recognize these traits through written correspondence as people reply, and I’ve learned much, Thank you.
Yes, as I understand it the directional function is in all creatures everywhere in time and space, including insects, mammals, humans (but not just humans) and does so on all worlds regardless of brain size or form. An inherent beacon and directional transponder. I’ve often wondered about “hive mind” and the way some insects and lizards change their color or patterns for either mating or defense, etc. Seems like a mind is acting, but not the brain of those creatures? The adjutants manage much related to the process of natural selection, environmental response, and evolutionary changes in all planetary creatures it seems.