Bonita wrote:
“Nigel, was Jesus talking about space or reality in that quote? I think he was talking about personality’s ability to function in various reality levels, not space levels.”
Bonita – thanks for thinking so deeply about this. Regarding that seven dimensional statement by Jesus, since it appears in a “Discourse on Time and Space (130:7)“, I can’t help but think of the cosmological implications, in addition to the seven potential dimensions of self-expression or person-realization (112:1.9)
Regarding time, it does seem natural and familiar to think of time as being intimately related to motion. But the concept of space is not so… intuitively accessible. For example, think of a mother racing 10 miles to the hospital in 5 minutes of time. But then she sits motionless for the next 12 hours. In those 12 hours, while not moving relative to her space, she is still moving through time. For me, this hints at the way our larger place in space (Nebadon) may be moving through both time and space.
Think how Michael, as a seven-fold Master Son — and hence involved with the Trinity Ultimate (119:8.6) — has a truly more-than-finite relationship with his creation:
(1318.5, 119:8.6) “… the liberation of his potential for absonite function. Michael, a Creator Son, is a time-space creator, but Michael, a sevenfold Master Son, is a member of one of the divine corps constituting the Trinity Ultimate.”
And then think how Michael, as a Creator Son, has always been somehow independent of time (within his creation), but only at some single place; while the Divine Minister exists ubiquitously throughout Nebadon, but only at some single moment in time. This peculiar arrangement allows Michael and the Divine Minister to nurture Nebadon in almost a more-than-finite way ( 376.6, 34:3.3 ):
“In personal prerogatives a Creative Spirit is wholly and entirely independent of space, but not of time.”
“[…] A Creator Son is not handicapped by time, but he is conditioned by space; […].”
“[…], for when these two function in administrative union, they are practically independent of time and space within the confines of their local creation. […]”
Bonita wrote:
“Isn’t space just one of the levels of finite reality?”
Recall that space is included in that list of VERY non-finite things (1160.2, 105:7.4):
“Among those realities which are associated with the transcendental level are the following:
1. The Deity presence of the Ultimate.
2. The concept of the master universe.
3. The Architects of the Master Universe.
4. The two orders of Paradise force organizers.
5. Certain modifications in space potency.
6. Certain values of spirit.
7. Certain meanings of mind.
8. Absonite qualities and realities.
9. Omnipotence, omniscience, and omnipresence.
10. Space.”
Clearly, time does not belong in this list. By definition, time is a phenomenon bound up with the “time-dependent” finite domain. Again, in 118:3.5, space is described as something way beyond “finite” constraints ( 1297.6, 118:3.5 ):
“Space comes the nearest of all nonabsolute things to being absolute. Space is apparently absolutely ultimate. [ … ]”
While time may be thought of as relative to motion in space, the motions of space itself, relative to Paradise, are less easy to pin down. Think of that rotated Maltese cross analogy in paper 11:7.3:
( 124.4, 11:7.3 ): “The vertical cross section of total space would slightly resemble a Maltese cross, […]”
( 124.6, 11:7.5 ) “[…], and then visualize this plane in elliptical revolution about Paradise, its revolution would roughly outline the volume of pervaded space.”
Since Paradise, the still point in the turning of this system, is not actually IN space ( 120.2, 11:2.10 ), and since the non-pervaded reservoirs appear to be absolutely distinct from pervaded space, for me, this image conjures up the idea of our entire measurable 3-space moving around Paradise in some “curved space path of lessened resistance to motion” ( 125.2, 11:7.8 )
When we reflect on reflectivity, the actualities and realities being reflected must in all sorts of ways be utterly beyond our imagination. And when the revelators speak of some of their cosmological statements as “standing in need of revision”, one such thing may be the now-pressing need to model actual reality with more than 3 spacelike dimensions. Welcome to my world!
Nigel