MALAKH or Moloch identify with Sumerian Enki?
Preview: a read-only copy of the forum. To post or reply, use the current forum.
MELCHIZEDEK, NORDAN, AND THE KENITES
102 posts · 6 participants · started Oct 4, 2020, 4:32 AM
Hindu god Varuna is identified as Sumerian god Enki?
Brahma is KA?
KA as Kainain?
Ptah is also asocieted with mysterious KA .
Sumerian sun god SHAMASH also asocieted with KA?
Shasu Yahweh worshipers
Shasu -Satu -Sutu -Seti
Sons of Seth
Anak origin of Shasu
Moloch is Seth?
Shasu recognise as Phoenicians
KENITES and SETHITES were same race ? Semitic?
Pali -Palistini or Philistines were Hidnu ?
Kayumar was brother of KAINAIN both were sons of Arpahxad the semite
Kayumar was brother of KAINAIN both were sons of Arpahxad the semite
Keyumars or Kiomars (Persian: کیومرث) was the name of the first king (shah) of the Pishdadian dynasty of Iran according to the Shahnameh.
The Shahnameh tells how the Iranians, having no confidence in the last of the Pishdadians, replaced them with another mythical dynasty, the Kayanians.
Ahura Mazda god of Persian royalty of Kayinites or Kenites is hindu god Varuna ? ????
Some of the Psalms are more uplifing and meaningful to me. Some of them are prayerful and others are scolding in tone. Or even pleading and desperate, expressive of the thoughts of the writers. And there were quite a few writers.
96:7.2 [Part III]The Psalms are the work of a score or more of authors; many were written by Egyptian and Mesopotamian teachers. During these times when the Levant worshiped nature gods, there were still a goodly number who believed in the supremacy of El Elyon, the Most High.But let’s read about Melchizedek and Abraham:35:4.5 [Part II]The Melchizedek who lived on Urantia during the time of Abraham was locally known as Prince of Salem because he presided over a small colony of truth seekers residing at a place called Salem. He volunteered to incarnate in the likeness of mortal flesh and did so with the approval of the Melchizedek receivers of the planet, who feared that the light of life would become extinguished during that period of increasing spiritual darkness. And he did foster the truth of his day and safely pass it on to Abraham and his associates.‘93:3.8 [Part III]And thus did Melchizedek prepare the way and set the monotheistic stage of world tendency for the bestowal of an actual Paradise Son of the one God, whom he so vividly portrayed as the Father of all, and whom he represented to Abraham as a God who would accept man on the simple terms of personal faith. And Michael, when he appeared on earth, confirmed all that Melchizedek had taught concerning the Paradise Father.Melchizedek arrived in the Arabian desert 1,973 years before Michael of Nebadon was born as a babe on our world.93:2.1 [Part III]It was 1,973 years before the birth of Jesus that Machiventa was bestowed upon the human races of Urantia. His coming was unspectacular; his materialization was not witnessed by human eyes. He was first observed by mortal man on that eventful day when he entered the tent of Amdon, a Chaldean herder of Sumerian extraction. And the proclamation of his mission was embodied in the simple statement which he made to this shepherd, “I am Melchizedek, priest of El Elyon, the Most High, the one and only God.”Melchizedek set the stage and prepared the way for monotheism. He trained teachers, missionaries, who went far and wide, preaching Machiventa’s gospel of man’s faith and trust in the one universal God as the only price of obtaining divine favor.
94:0.1 [Part III]THE early teachers of the Salem religion penetrated to the remotest tribes of Africa and Eurasia, ever preaching Machiventa’s gospel of man’s faith and trust in the one universal God as the only price of obtaining divine favor. Melchizedek’s covenant with Abraham was the pattern for all the early propaganda that went out from Salem and other centers. Urantia has never had more enthusiastic and aggressive missionaries of any religion than these noble men and women who carried the teachings of Melchizedek over the entire Eastern Hemisphere. These missionaries were recruited from many peoples and races, and they largely spread their teachings through the medium of native converts. They established training centers in different parts of the world where they taught the natives the Salem religion and then commissioned these pupils to function as teachers among their own people.And further – the evolution to get to monotheism:96:0.1 [Part III]IN CONCEIVING of Deity, man first includes all gods, then subordinates all foreign gods to his tribal deity, and finally excludes all but the one God of final and supreme value. The Jews synthesized all gods into their more sublime concept of the Lord God of Israel. The Hindus likewise combined their multifarious deities into the “one spirituality of the gods” portrayed in the Rig-Veda, while the Mesopotamians reduced their gods to the more centralized concept of Bel-Marduk. These ideas of monotheism matured all over the world not long after the appearance of Machiventa Melchizedek at Salem in Palestine. But the Melchizedek concept of Deity was unlike that of the evolutionary philosophy of inclusion, subordination, and exclusion; it was based exclusively on creative power and very soon influenced the highest deity concepts of Mesopotamia, India, and Egypt.We do learn from olden written records. And the research is wonderful and meaningful especially to those who have mastered these various records. I think very few people choose to achieve such granularity of the chronologies. But look what the Hebrew priests did to the telling of their own story. And they are not the only people who have tinkered with with their stories to make records that are incorrect. But don’t rock the boat.Reincarnation of Melchizedek that sound like Essenes doctrine .
In Hebrews 7, Melchizedek is described as fatherless and motherless without a family tree, but why was his coming not prophesied if it was the great Michael himself? and why his second coming in the body of Jesus was prophesied and why was Jesus born from the body of Mary? why did he not come in the same way as Melchizedek?
