(1191.6) 108:5.5 The Mystery Monitors are not thought helpers; they are thought adjusters. They labor with the material mind for the purpose of constructing, by adjustment and spiritualization, a new mind for the new worlds and the new name of your future career. Their mission chiefly concerns the future life, not this life. They are called heavenly helpers, not earthly helpers. They are not interested in making the mortal career easy; rather are they concerned in making your life reasonably difficult and rugged, so that decisions will be stimulated and multiplied. The presence of a great Thought Adjuster does not bestow ease of living and freedom from strenuous thinking, but such a divine gift should confer a sublime peace of mind and a superb tranquillity of spirit.
Regardless of what you wish to call the Thought Adjuster, it is part of yourself, which can intercede with decision making however, it still amazes me that so many readers do not pay attention to their own thoughts enough to acquire an understanding of what can be adjusted, and why and when an adjustment might be needed. As Bradly has also mentioned and noted, that it would seem that those narrating some of these Urantia Book entries are not able to truly understand what and how the Thought Adjuster can effect someone, even to the degree that each individual may have progressed to different levels where this type of intervention can differ one to another, therefore it would seem that instead of validating specific quotes if might be more beneficial to post specific experiences which just might assimilate an adjustment or an interaction with others who just may be aware of various altered states of minds. So, with this in mind I will present a true encounter which is meant to share an experience which was interactive and might not have been possible without the intervention with Thought Adjusters where it is somewhat understood that Thought Adjusters can communicate with each other and if there are personalities which have progressed beyond a specific point may be able to understand this interaction.
It was about two years ago when I was summoned for Jury Duty in a Capital Trial which was stated in the highest charge of many presented as First Degree Attempted Murder, although the District Attorney saw it necessary to add three additional lesser charges in order to, hopefully secure one of these chargers in order to acquire a conviction, at least this was my opinion from the reading of the charges. As it turned out I was not one of the first 14 to fill the jurors chairs for cross examination by the prosecution and the defense for the purposes of selecting a jury. However, it was stated to the remainder of the prospective jurors to make note of the questions and the procedure because we all would be going through this process and that for the sake of time, repetition would not be forthcoming. Nevertheless, I noted that the Defense Attorney was being aided by an individual who is often hired to evaluate prospective jurors because they have acquired the ability to choose or reject individuals based on their insight into personalities which may side favorably to the case being presented. Along with the Defendant these three were huddled together at various times for what ever reason as the questioning continued. As it turned out, from the first group of individuals only three persons were chosen for duty, but as this process was going on I was mentally making my own evaluations of whether these various individuals would or would not make affective jurors for the defense’s case, where it was obvious that some where responding to questions which might indicate that they wanted on the jury and some did not, where one person was a Hasidic Jew, who through his religious beliefs, would not be able to even make a decision one way or another. As these proceedings were going on, I would be verbalizing to myself these various reasons in my mind and making various choices or rejections based on my own opinion, just something to pass the time, and also get an understanding of what I might expect, when it came to being my turn on stage, so to speck.
Things went on relatively well until the first group was finished and the remainder of use where allowed to take a brake before continuing in the outer hallway. This is where many individuals grouped together and were sitting on benches provided, waiting for the next session, where I located myself away from the majority of the group far down the hallway, finding a bench to relax in solitude. But, I noticed that the Defense Attorney and his advisor where in conference at the far end of the hallway and shortly after their conversation which seemed to include looking at the various individuals in the hallway, the Attorneys advisor started to walk around looking at the various people, working his way down the hallway toward me. For some reason I was aware of being singled out for some reason and as it turned out, he came down to my bench and sat down next to me and took out his cell phone and was focusing on it but, at that instance I was made aware of his presence and in my mind he asked a question, somewhat unusual from my previous thoughts, where I was asked, “do you want on this jury?” – where I responded, mentally in my mind, “It’s not my call.” At that moment the advisor got up and left the area.
As it turned out, I was in the next group selected, for examination and we were asked by the judge if any of use had any predetermined thoughts about the case so far, where I raised my hand and said that I was slightly prejudice against the prosecution’s case in that it seemed to weighted against the defense just because of all of the various charges presented, and that I thought that they were going to get the defendant on something regardless of evidence. Also, the prosecution presented their witness list and I was not sure of whether I know one of the witnesses being used as a Doctor presenting a opinion against the defendant. Nevertheless, these answers did not eliminate me from the Defenses questions where it seemed like he was focusing on me more so because I had responded to many of the questions in the affirmative, when asked if any of use had members in out family who were mentally handicapped, or if we ever had to ask someone to leave my home because of their actions while in my home, and whether we had been taught how to use a weapon and at what age, where I responded that I was taught to take care and to use weapons when I was about eight years old. Although I was not selected for jury duty, rightfully so, I became quit familiar with the judge as he would point me out when he would ask specific questions which I would have to respond by raising hand, where he would say, “with the exception of Mr. xyz, and the Defense Attorney seemed to focus on many of my answers and asking for more elaborate answers, where it seemed that he was prepping the remaining prospects in the courtroom to feed them the kind of answers he was looking for and in some ways setting up his case in advance in order to make a better impact with the rest of the prospective jurors, being that I had to notify the court that I was once charged with a similar but found not guilty.
It was interesting though, that as I left the courtroom the prosecuting Attorney had not made eye contact with me as I passed by but, I was a little surprised that the three sitting at attention at the Defense table, gave me an Eye’s left, as I passed by, where I was feeling like I needed to give them a return salute, but made only eye contact in response.
Now, I left out much of the details of this encounter but this was not the first time where I got the feeling of someone asking me a question, where it was only noticeable from my minds prospective, yet it would seem that even though one would assume that this type of experience would put reality into a different light, one could also assume that if Thought Adjusters were able to communicate with one another and if persons were in tone with their Thought Adjusters, that this type of experience would start to make more sense.
