↗ Live site
Preview: a read-only copy of the forum. To post or reply, use the current forum.

Revisionist Cosmology

26 posts · 6 participants · started Apr 19, 2016, 4:11 AM

  1. Hi Michael,

    You wrote:

    “Perhaps how rain is produced would be a suitable analogy?!“

    I use the rain analogy at time 2:21 in video 4B1. With water vapour as absoluta and clouds as segregata, the drops falling on forests become ultimatons   :good:

    For easier reference, see page 5 in the script.

    Nigel

  2. Hello Nigel – sorry I have been away from the forum discussions for a while. I have a parent who seems to be developing dementia, or something related. I’m happy to know that you already used rain as an analogy; I will view that link soon. As for your prior post, I may re-read it one or two more times after I view your rain analogy. I like learning astronomy and other sciences but sometimes it takes me a little time to fully understand the language specific to each discipline. Likewise, terms specific to the UB (like the differences between the various universe levels (such as local, grand, master, etc) slowed down my learning, until I saw one of your prior videos.

    It’s quite late for me now, so goodnight – Michael

  3. Hello Nigel,

    I viewed your video containing the analogy of how rain forms – that really was helpful for me to better understand the relationships between Absoluta, Segregata, and Ultimata. Thank you!

    Michael

  4. Okay, so finally we have a picture of the massive black hole in the center of our galaxy. But to me it seems that the picture does not match with the simulations. What are the three light-emitting things? To my eyes they don’t look like the expected accretion disc.

    I refer to this YouTube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SVxE6F6REyE

     

     

  5. I read news about an observed stellar black hole that is much bigger than was thought to be possible.

    That lead me thinking: So they have been observing something that should not be, or something that does not fit in their calculations. Either it is exactly what they think they have been observing, or it may be something else they did not know anything about.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/science/2019/11/29/scientists-find-monster-black-hole-so-big-they-didnt-think-it-was-possible/

    Astronomers found also a supermassive black hole SAGE0536AGN is much larger than it should be.

    https://www.space.com/30651-supermassive-black-hole-surprisingly-large.html

     

  6. Hi Nigel!

    I have viewed your most excellent video. It would seem most of it is well above my pay-grade. Still, even though it does not reflect the scientific method at work, it does give us a point of reference. Yes I’m the same “rhermen” from Truthbook forums. Apparently, they no longer allow new posts, so perhaps we can engage in discussion here. From late 2007 to early 2010 I was a forty something undergrad at university attempting to major in physics (with emphasis on astrophysics). It went well enough until first year calculus for physics majors. I failed twice and barely passed on the third attempt. Clearly I don’t have what it takes to be a rocket scientist. But now as I make this post in nov 2024 my somewhat skeptical interest in TUB and the science it presents remains. Please be patient with me as it’s been so long since I’ve thought in any kind of scientific terms. Also my at home internet access is limited to 5GB data per month. But you gotta start somewhere, so if you’re willing, let’s start here!

    Randy

    p.s. It would seem the James Webb Space Telescope is operational!

    Anyone with a mind has an opinion and that opinion is a reflection of that mind.

Reply on the current forum

↑ Back to top