Hi all,
There are a lot of options for reading The Urantia Book online for those who read it that way — with every UB organization posting up their own copy, not to mention various individuals with their own websites — and many people I’m sure still favor reading a paper book. How do you all tend to read it? I didn’t even own a print copy myself until more than 10 years after I started reading the book, and mainly it sits on a shelf untouched since I read it on my laptop and devices.
As a part of another project, I came to see I could use a website of the book that has some features which aren’t available with other online versions. After looking through all the major online editions of the UB, I also thought that there was some room for improvement compared to what’s already out there. So while I was at it I tried to make a site that from my perspective also is a useful and pleasant one to read in its own way.
I tend to use it now as the main digital version I read on my laptop, but I’d be interested in hearing feedback if any of you would mind taking a look and letting me know your impressions. Improvements I made (as I see it) compared to other online versions of the book:
Functional improvements
* I designed it from the beginning to be fast. Right now from the tests I’ve done, its load speed ranges from 6-10x faster than other online UB websites.
* Very quick and easy to go to or link to any reference number in the book since standard reference numbers work in the URL. For example, bigbluebook.org/101/2/4 takes you to 101:2.4 … you can also just point to a section (bigbluebook.org/101/2) or a paper (bigbluebook.org/101)
* You can go to any page number in accordance with Urantia Foundation’s pagination of 1 – 2,097. To go to page 1,000 for example, any of these will work:
bigbluebook.org/p1000
bigbluebook.org/p/1000
bigbluebook.org/pg/1000
bigbluebook.org/page/1000
* Made it for both desktop and mobile viewing
* Reference numbers by default are hidden. When using a desktop browser, if you hover your mouse over the indent of a paragraph you’ll see the reference number appear for a while (works best on Firefox and Chrome). If you click the reference number, all the reference numbers in the paper switch on to be visible in light gray. Click again and they all turn off. There isn’t a way to “hover” a mouse pointer when using your finger on a mobile screen, but the reference numbers are still there and tapping them makes them visible/invisible
Stylistic improvements
* A serif font that is more typical for books than the sans serif fonts all the organizations seem to use online
* Instead of both paper:section.paragraph (P:S.P) and page.paragraph reference numbers being crammed onto each line, page number shows only on the first paragraph of each page, while all other lines display P:S.P
* Paragraph cluster spacing from the 1955 first edition
* Avoidance of visual clutter… minimalistic headers and footers, no sidebars
* Attention to every small typesetting detail I’ve come across in the book, for instance all the indentations in bigbluebook.org/30 and the presentation of “poetic” passages such as bigbluebook.org/122/9/4
* Sometimes you can be in a situation where you’d like to point someone to the book, but you just want to allow the book to speak for itself without it being surrounded by any other material. This is an online version of the book that has no references to any organizations or secondary materials, except that for translations there will be a Urantia Foundation copyright notice.
Simple, functional, fast, just purely the book and nothing else (the Standard Reference Text). I’d be grateful if you would let me know how it looks to you, and I would be especially grateful if in your daily or weekly readings of The Urantia Book that you even would use the website a few times as a substitute for your usual method to see how well it works or not for everyday purposes, let me know about anything that could stand to be improved. One feature request I imagine would be a search capability, but I have a lot of other competing priorities at the moment and so that’s not going to be a possibility in the near future, since it’d be much more involved to do.
I intend to cross post this over at the Truthbook forum also.
Many thanks,
tas




