↗ Live site
Preview: a read-only copy of the forum. To post or reply, use the current forum.

God is no respecter of persons

4 posts · 3 participants · started Apr 17, 2025, 6:03 PM

  1. This phrase came into my mind a few days ago and it sticks with me. The particular thing about it to me is that it informs me that since God is no respecter of persons, then so should I be no respecter of persons. Do you think that I am right to conclude that I, also, should be no respecter of persons?

     

    Implied in the phrase is that God gives all of himself to his creature children. But since we humans are at the bottom of the totem pole, we certainly are not God-like. I don’t qualify as one who can in actuality be no respecter of persons.

     

    What do you think?

  2. Mara,

    A ‘no respecter of persons” search engine revealed about 17 hits, some of which were from Jesus quotes. I suspect he and the several authors are telling us all persons are equally valued, and no one should accept another’s possible opinion they are superior to anyone else. No one is to be treated as less important and no one gets special indulgence privileges. In other words, this is substantiation of other teachings that each person is individual with God. See pre-eminence of the individual in 170:8 through 13 from Jesus himself.

     

    We are not required to kneel before others in spirit. There is no royalty with spiritual siblings. I conclude no special respect; just friendship.

    It is good to ask such questions because movement to divine ideals requires thinking and considering options. Close looks at those options shines needed lights. 😎😎

     

  3. To me, “God is no respecter of persons” means no favorites.  Equally adored regardless of adorability!  That takes a wisdom and enlightenment that is rare, even unnatural perhaps, for us tadpoles.  An ideal for our aspirations?

    (1098.3) 100:4.6 You cannot truly love your fellows by a mere act of the will. Love is only born of thoroughgoing understanding of your neighbor’s motives and sentiments. It is not so important to love all men today as it is that each day you learn to love one more human being. If each day or each week you achieve an understanding of one more of your fellows, and if this is the limit of your ability, then you are certainly socializing and truly spiritualizing your personality. Love is infectious, and when human devotion is intelligent and wise, love is more catching than hate. But only genuine and unselfish love is truly contagious. If each mortal could only become a focus of dynamic affection, this benign virus of love would soon pervade the sentimental emotion-stream of humanity to such an extent that all civilization would be encompassed by love, and that would be the realization of the brotherhood of man.

    "Live loyally today—grow—and tomorrow will attend to itself. The quickest way for a tadpole to become a frog is to live loyally each moment as a tadpole."

  4. Thanks Mark for the reference to Paper 170!

    I too was taught from an early age to not be ashamed or prideful of my station, profession, income, wealth, or social position nor to look down on anyone or admire anyone by such measures, but rather, to admire character and kindness and goodness and courage and loyalty and duty and skill and accomplisment and to avoid smugness, meanness, haughtiness, and similar expressions of self importance.  To look up to others as God’s beloved children and be generous and forgiving and kind to all.

    Which doesn’t mean I managed such lessons well, but such is the example of The Master in all his Biblical teachings and parables; the shepherd leaving the 99 to seek out the one, etc.  “Jesus loves all the little children of the world”!

    A fascinating reality is that we all collectively benefit by every act of love and kindness  and generosity and mercy by every person everywhere.   Individually we benefit by loving all others, but collectively we all benefit by the personalized, individual acts of love by others no matter how enlightened or inclusive those others may be.

    The universe economics of love blesses the each according to personal enlightenment and spiritual progress, but blesses the all by every experience and expression of love everywhere by everyone regardless of individual spiritization of us or them.

    (1862.7) 170:3.10 The religion of the kingdom is personal, individual; the fruits, the results, are familial, social. Jesus never failed to exalt the sacredness of the individual as contrasted with the community. But he also recognized that man develops his character by unselfish service; that he unfolds his moral nature in loving relations with his fellows.

    (1862.8) 170:3.11 By teaching that the kingdom is within, by exalting the individual, Jesus struck the deathblow of the old society in that he ushered in the new dispensation of true social righteousness. This new order of society the world has little known because it has refused to practice the principles of the gospel of the kingdom of heaven. And when this kingdom of spiritual pre-eminence does come upon the earth, it will not be manifested in mere improved social and material conditions, but rather in the glories of those enhanced and enriched spiritual values which are characteristic of the approaching age of improved human relations and advancing spiritual attainments.

    "Live loyally today—grow—and tomorrow will attend to itself. The quickest way for a tadpole to become a frog is to live loyally each moment as a tadpole."

Reply on the current forum

↑ Back to top