Bonita,
How do you do your formatting? I use this style in emails, but how do I get the “bonita wrote” and as a hyperlink and the indentations? I’ll use different fonts, italics and see how that works/looks.
mehill wrote: Is it not a consideration that Michael is now our Planetary Prince?
Yes, Michael is currently our Planetary Prince, but he is not functioning as such. I think Machiventa currently has that responsibility as vicegerent and he has allowed the Jerusem council of twenty-four to continue governing rather than shake things up.
Yes, true, but the citation states that a rebellion has ended with the arrival of a divine son. Arrived. Ended. That was the issue I thought we were addressing – when the rebellion ended. 53:9.7 The rebellion has ended on Jerusem. It ends on the fallen worlds as fast as divine Sons arrive. We believe that all rebels who will ever accept mercy have done so.
And the second sentence is a response to your earlier comment about folks not deciding as below:
mehill wrote: You think that Lucifer has not made up his mind – what’s left of it? I think his spurning of Michael’s overtures of forgiveness pretty much settled the matter for him. He ain’t a-turning back. I think his mind is obsessed with evil – anything to thwart any effort associated with Michael. I think at this point, pretty much all associated with the rebellion have staked their lots. You seem to think otherwise? How so?
What I’m saying is that I’m not clear that Lucifer and his associates, supporters and sympathizers have accepted annihilation. Until they do, they’ll live on. I agree, I don’t think Lucifer will change his mind, but he has to come to the point where he accepts the consequences of his actions. There has to be a point where he accepts the inevitable justice of the Ancients as fair. Personally, because of his stubbornness, I don’t see this as coming anytime soon, which leaves us in that precarious place of having to wait for time to work its magic. Meanwhile, we have a stinker named Caligastia who seems to love creating chaos. It’s his middle name.
I agree that really no one has accepted annihilation as it has not yet been adjudicated that such shall be the sentence. I think you’re suggesting that as long as Lucifer (or really any of the arch-rebels lives, we’re still in an “insurrectionary experience”); if so, I disagree with that. The quote above says “the rebellion has ended on Jerusem” and there are other such citations in the Jesus papers. It’s over. But I think you disagree with me on this. I do think once the AoD pass judgment he’ll take it.
mehill wrote:But to the question of satisfying the conditions for Trinity embrace: “insurrectionary experience” and “rebellion tested” are you suggesting such conditions are still present on 606?
I really don’t know. What is the threshold for insurrectionary experience? The authors of TUB aren’t really specific about that, which is why I haven’t made my mind up about it. I could see it go either way.
Using the dictionary definition works and the context in which the words are used gives meaning. A superior defies his divine superior and viola we have rebellion.
mehill wrote:You write about the last personality hasn’t made up his mind. When do you think was the “last personality” eligible for trinity embrace was born? Or do you think they are still being born? I think the ice is very, very thin here.
I’m sorry, I don’t understand the question. I was talking about the last personality involved in the rebellion.
If you are saying that we’re not involved in the rebellion!? Then what’s your point? The issue is are we or are we not eligible for Trinity embrace. Since we’re not in an “insurrectionary experience” or faced with the option of being “rebellion tested”, how can it be that we “mortals who read this message may [ourselves] ascend to Paradise, attain the Trinity embrace”. That’s the square one question.
mehill wrote:Do we say that those created perfect such as Havona natives are better/not better than mortals who have achieved perfection? While the roads are different, the results (in this age) are the same, no?
No, I don’t think it’s the same. If it is the same, why would TUB include this paragraph about perfect beings being so different from us, the perfected:
p52:3 3:5.17 The creatures of Havona are naturally brave, but they are not courageous in the human sense. They are innately kind and considerate, but hardly altruistic in the human way. They are expectant of a pleasant future, but not hopeful in the exquisite manner of the trusting mortal of the uncertain evolutionary spheres. They have faith in the stability of the universe, but they are utter strangers to that saving faith whereby mortal man climbs from the status of an animal up to the portals of Paradise. They love the truth, but they know nothing of its soul-saving qualities. They are idealists, but they were born that way; they are wholly ignorant of the ecstasy of becoming such by exhilarating choice. They are loyal, but they have never experienced the thrill of wholehearted and intelligent devotion to duty in the face of temptation to default. They are unselfish, but they never gained such levels of experience by the magnificent conquest of a belligerent self. They enjoy pleasure, but they do not comprehend the sweetness of the pleasure escape from the pain potential.
I see these as varying characteristics of perfection and I suspect they are different for each created perfect being as well as each perfected being. After all, isn’t perfection (however attained) living the Father’s will as one earnestly perceives/understands it? Isn’t the whole idea of personality to have a huge, wonderful mix (one might an infinite mix) of folks each manifesting a personal interpretation of God’s will. Cool!
Only ascendant creatures have souls.
mehill wrote:LOL… you must have a hidden desire to be a hairdresser!
WHOA!! That’s eerie. How did you know that I’ve been cutting my own hair for the last seven months? I got tired of spending hundreds of dollars only to come home and have to “fix it”. So yeah, I guess I do have a hidden desire to be a hairdresser. Weird. Really weird.
Life is a mystery.
mehill wrote:I just joined this forum this morning and I must say, I have enjoyed a wonderful time of discussion with you and Van Amadon. I have the sense that both of you are on here a lot.
Oh, well welcome. It’s nice to have new people to talk to. Yeah . . . been here forever. Lots of folks come and go. Hope you stay.
Thanks! It snowed here last night and it’s still pretty cold outside, so it’s been an inside day for me. I can’t recall the last time I spent this much time on the computer! But it is enjoyable. So far I’ve met three – you, Van Amadon, and Bradley. Wonder if anyone else will show up with a proposed solution to our conundrum.
Michael