Dear everyone,
I do not post often, but I referred to this forum often when need to clarify a point of view concerning perspectives… As UB encourages us to do sharing one another for greater alignment …. recognition of religious living in others… sharing one’s spiritual life with one’s fellows. [100:1.8]
Concerning this tab about experiencing different avenues.
I am 57 and born ”catholic” on my spiritual journey I experienced at 17 join a sect. Was I aware I’ll be led what to do, what to think? No. Experiencing is vital and all in our ascension.
While your religion is a matter of personal experience, it is most important that you should be exposed to the knowledge of a vast number of other religious experiences (the diverse interpretations of other and diverse mortals) to the end that you may prevent your religious life from becoming egocentric – circumscribed, selfish, and unsocial. (103:1.3)
All children of God, all my sisters and brothers in the vast creation, we are ”set” ”drive” from our creation to stand in front of Our Universal Father… The God of all creation, the First Source and Center of all things and beings. (1:0.1)
How interesting magmasloth your subject about our human perception of truth !!!
versus
The bestowal of the Spirit of Truth, man is subject to the teaching and guidance of a threefold spirit endowment: the spirit of the Father, the Thought Adjuster; the spirit of the Son, the Spirit of Truth; the spirit of the Spirit, the Holy Spirit. (194:2.11)
I would like to share a similar experience concerning ”experiencing the truth”.
It’s been over 25 yrs I read UB. I attend many study groups, school UBIS. Nothing ever outclassed UB.
Everything I experience, I do it under the guidance of my Divine partner (T/A) and spiritual ministry.
A while ago attending a study group few among the group suggest a book considering it ”the next following step forward UB”. But because the book content was too much ”spiritual” we need a course to be equipped to read it.
Nevertheless, I got the book and read it.
The book was so ”mind blowing” it took me a good 2 months to stabilize my balance. In my ”personal” point of view, I didn’t need to be attuned by a pre-course to engage. 2 yrs later, I still abide by my decision. The guidance of my T/A was ALL I trust (point final).
The book was well mingle with sophisms, and truth.
Def: A sophism is a statement to deceive someone in a debate or conversation. It might be made to seem to make sense when really being wrong, or it might use difficult words and complicated sentences to intimidate the audience into agreeing.
… just to let you know how I was feeling or perceiving….
As I close the book, I said…
- ”Well, why do I need ascension if I am God.”
And some sophisms were…
- ”I am God who disguise myself in temptation to test you.”
- ” Your origin is from heavens”
- ”goal, to reach a impersonal life”
… So to do a good homeworks after two months I decide to reread the book and highlight sophisms/truths.
I made 3/4 of the book and decide to stop there because it was obvious to me who was the author of the book as I wrote, highlight and underline.
————————… By the way, my name is Caligastia————————————–